Comparison of animal feet, historical art

Comparison of animal feet, historical art

P117/0005 Rights Managed

Request low-res file

530 pixels on longest edge, unwatermarked

Request/Download high-res file

Uncompressed file size: 25.4MB

Downloadable file size: 933.8KB

Price image Pricing

Please login to use the price calculator


Credit: SHEILA TERRY/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

Caption: Comparison of animals' foot anatomy. Coloured historical artwork of the bones of the foot of an elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, ox and horse. The number of weight-bearing toes reduces from left to right. In the elephant, the inner toe (marked I) is reduced and contains fewer bones than the others. This toe is seen to be greatly reduced or absent in the feet of the other animals. The number of toes is a characteristic feature of two mammal orders; the Artiodactlya (even-toed ungulates such as the hippo, ox, pig and deer) and Perissodactlya (odd-toed ungulates such as the rhino, horse and tapir). This artwork was published in The Human Foot and The Human Hand by G M Humphry, in 1861.

Release details: Model release not required. Property release not required.

Keywords: 1800s, 1861, 19th century, anatomical, anatomy, animal, artwork, biological, biology, body, bone, bones, coloured, comparing, comparison, differences, different, elephant, false-coloured, fauna, feet, five, foot, g. m. humphry, gm humphrey, hippo, hippopotamus, horse, human hand, illustration, leg, nature, ox, quintet, rhino, rhinoceros, the human foot and the, toe, toes, zoological, zoology

Licence fees: A licence fee will be charged for any media (low or high resolution) used in your project.